I think they are all civilian registered refugees from military programs, with the possible exception of the Beech F33C which might have been developed for the Lufthansa training academy?
Good looking aircraft, but am not sure they ever go upside down that often.
It is a pity they have not built a niche in Europe as IFR upset or unusual attitude trainers. If it was (is?) good for Lufthansa flight crew, there probably is a market niche for an IFR upset training school in Europe? There are a few in the US operating mainly F33C, and possibly some operating the SF260.
Given the interest from the PC12 thread it probably would not be bad insurance for single pilot IFR operators?
The geared Lycoming on the FW/Piaggio 149 might not make it ideal.
Soviet style attitude indicators in the Yak 18T might be culturally challenging, but the school could run them on mogas which might reduce the prodigious fuel bill a bit.
I think they are all civilian registered refugees from military programs, with the possible exception of the Beech F33C which might have been developed for the Lufthansa training academy?
Don’t think so. Lufthansa used (and still use) only non-aerobatic Bonanzas.
Bosco Lufthansa used to have F33A, with a specific upset training module in F33C – whether this is still the case I can’t tell you. Have they upgraded to G36 models?
Have found this ppt which suggests that the F33C is still in service as part of the academy, even in the new MPL programme.
Robert, you are right, they seem to have a few F33Cs, but most of them are As for sure.
G36? No. In fact, I can’t see them spending a million for a single engine piston trainer. But upgrading to glass cockpits would make sense sooner or later. I’ll have to ask a friend to see if they have some sort of retrofit glass cockpits in their primary trainers.
And the Saab 91 Safir It is a 3 seat aerobatic trainer. Some 4 seat versions also exist of the Safir. I have to “renew” my aerobatic skills (I have to take a real rating, since my “rating” 20 years ago is not valid anymore according to new rules). This will be done on this aircraft sometime in the spring next year:
It’s a rather cool aircraft. Retractable gear, constant speed propeller. Full IFR (or at least used to be, I think the instruments are way too ancient by today’s standard).
LeSving, the SAAB Safir at Aero Friedrichshafen last year was one of the more interesting aircraft on display… to me Obviously built like the proverbial brick outhouse, sticks, aerobatic and military style design. I’d love to try one!
I’ve had the opportunity to try some of the others. The SF260 tries hard to fly like a jet, thin wing etc. Not sure that makes for the best plane overall. I’d own one in a heartbeat anyway, if one came my way. The Yak 18T doesn’t appeal to me, too huge and yokes (but I’d take a Yak 50 or even a Yak 18P in its place). I haven’t tried the Piaggio 149 but with an old GO-480 to maintain and Navion looks it doesn’t really grab me. Still happy somebody keeps them flying!
In the US, foreign ex-military piston aircraft are great for for the individual owner because annuals can be signed off by ‘any old A&P’ who happens to be in the area (no IA), and there are no operating radius issues in that segment of Experimental Exhibition.
Have fun in the SAAB!
Vic it requires a bit of double think to use private and soviet in the same sentence, but interesting that they were only used in the civilian training programme.
Here is a link on an article on the difference between western and Russian attitude indicators, possibly all 18Ts in the west are fitted with western AIs?
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/learmount/2009/02/which_way_is_up_for_eastern_an/