Note: they just raised the price by 90 pounds, so it looks like they may not be the best deal now.
They did honor the original pricing for me (600 w/ VAT) so kudos to them.
Peter wrote:
The fixed unit DOES float, when you remove it from the aircraft.
Actually this is one of the required test to this unit after battery
check, it has to be submerced in a special fixture, to check for leaks,
and to see it will float when released. The unit will float with the
antenna upwards.
Thanks for all this info Peter. It is interesting that they require a float test for a fixed unit…
Just another special cost at annual… not very interesting for me.
The idea is a good one, to have all the components integrated to provide autonomous operation.
Clearly, that has not been effectively implemented. Bummer.
I got this input from an avionics installer:
Peter wrote:
transmits on 121.50 because that is what S&R vehicles use for close-range DF
Thanks for that detail. I’m learning quite a bit from EuroGA, thanks.
I’ve also updated my original post to include the product info for the Kannad Integra AF
It can be used as a portable ELT, but you’d need a rubber duck antenna to effectively use it that way (their products page lists the AP portable model).
I was hoping to get rid of an external Antenna and gain a few kts airspeed.
Sound like it would be a poor trade-off…
I don’t know the answer to the original Q but I do know that
MedFlyer wrote:
AND another flexible one
The Integra is just such an ELT, offering integrated, modular and externally mounted antennas.
Good point about the Al btw. Didn’t think Al completely blocked that frequency, but after digging a bit, it clearly does.
I’ll have to mess with it and see how much is blocked, or if the multipath through the cockpit is enough to reliably feed it…
Will run some tests. Thanks for pointing this out.
simon32 wrote:
I am not sure whether it transmits on 121.5, but an external antenna would be required for that feature.
It does, but that’s only mandatory in the US. As long as one doesn’t fly N or in the US, it isn’t really applicable. In any case, I’m betting a little more on the integrated GPS and Satellite link of the 406 anyway…
121.5 is fairly obsolete and there was a drawn-out discussion about getting rid of it altogether, but the US fleet is so large… there’s no chance (yet).
Easy to start an argument with this subject as rules and regulations differ between countries. In the USA and Canada, an external antenna is required, but it only has to be external to the unit not necessarily the airframe.
“The INTEGRA ELT may also be installed on certain models of aircraft without having to fit an expensive external antenna (national authorities rules and regulations permitting) and an additional external GPS interface. This will reduce cost and complexity for the aircraft owner when choosing to install the all-important life saving device.”
I am not sure whether it transmits on 121.5, but an external antenna would be required for that feature.
Simon
I feel that normaly it should be a poor performer if you ever come into a situation to depend on that. GPS signals are weak signals,easily blocked by metal frames.Moreover,distress signal at 406Mhz is best transmitted at “line of sight”.Actualy I have seen versions with fixed ext antenna AND another flexible one ,being fastened to the box,so that if you survive your emergency landing in Amazonia,you just remove the compound and get out to keep on transmitting position and distress.