They don’t aim for more warnings, they aim to reduce false-negative warnings.
mh wrote:
they aim to reduce false-negative warnings
I guess you mean false positives? That is pointless warnings? In that case it’s really good news! You don’t happen to have any pointers to where I can read more about this?
Airborne_Again wrote:
where I can read more about this?
I think they want to generate new regulations based on Pro-Safe raport
It is important to note, that aviation standards call for other warning levels (lower) then those for household use.
Quote(a) Each passenger and crew compartment must be suitably ventilated. Carbon monoxide concentration may not exceed one part in 20,000 parts of air.
Note that 1:20,000 (which is the design requirement) is equal to 50 parts per million (ppm) (which is what most CO detectors will display).
An interesting demo on carbon monoxide detectors!
Thanksor the posting, Colm. Good to see that it was the right decision to move to the “chinese” tool.
Thanks for posting.This was very interesting indeed.
Keep in mind that you need to replace these electronic CO detectors on a regular basis, whether it is the cheap chinese, or the one for your home at 00:18.
Hmmm… interesting! Thanks for posting that.
FWIW, most of the CO detectors of the SleepSafe style that I have seen installed on the PPL training scene were already black and had been like that since for ever