Interesting interview with Climate Scientist Dr. Judith Curry.
@dirkdj: that is old stuff. See: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/mar/13/science.media
After all the debunkers will have been debunked, we will see that there is no more money left and that the climate has solved itself.
“Whilst it’s nice to think we’re insulating our house and being super efficient, it’s not ideal when china is using enough greenhouse gases in insulation production to create a measurable hole in the ozone layer.”
CFCs are coincidentally greenhouse gases, but the hole in the Ozone layer (which last I heard was healing) is a seperate concern from the greenhouse effect.
kwlf wrote:
CFCs are coincidentally greenhouse gases, but the hole in the Ozone layer (which last I heard was healing) is a seperate concern from the greenhouse effect.
I was refering to this report https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44738952
Just a simple question: what is our moral justification for denying the effect of global warming to the species and populations which would benefit from it?
Lots of very good scientific papers by real scientists on www.heartland.org
Many subjects.
As I told before, the is a climate war going on and wars are usually about money first, some cash in, most pay dearly.
If we want to make the world a better place, ‘fighting climate change’ is on the bottom of the list as far as cost/benefit is concerned.