Peter wrote:
I also recall EASA requiring an EASA CPL for any paid instruction in Euro-land, regardless of aircraft reg or license/rating being trained.
Not valid in Sweden, PPL/FIs get paid and it is perfectly legal.
Peter wrote:
If training towards EASA papers, and the client is paying, it seems clear that you need EASA CPL theory.
Partially, but that does not mean holding a CPL. One needs CPL theory to become a FI and train people towards a PPL. Without CPL theory, one can:
Dimme wrote:
Not valid in Sweden, PPL/FIs get paid and it is perfectly legal.
Not a Swedish thing either. It is very clearly stated in FCL.205.A(b). It’s not even in an AMC but in the regulation proper, so there is no way a national authority could prevent PPL FIs from being paid.
OK, so one needs CPL theory to become a FI and train people towards a PPL, and the payment is irrelevant.
The UK requirement for a CPL to be paid for any training in UK airspace must have gone away when this EASA concession came in – at least for training towards EASA papers.
Whether it remains for training towards non EASA papers is unanswered; various previous threads – example.
Peter wrote:
Whether it remains for training towards non EASA papers is unanswered
The holder of a (non–Part-FCL) UK PPL whose licence includes an instructor certificate is entitled to give flying instruction for remuneration or other valuable consideration. Schedule 8 to the Air Navigation Order.
That’s good.
Would an FAA CFI/CFII training in UK airspace towards FAA papers be required to hold any EASA papers?
See above, starting at the top.
[ edited – identical-topic threads merged ]
