Yes; just gone live. Someone very kindly found a vulnerability which had to be fixed and fixing it broke a few things but it is back up now.
I will start a new thread on it.
Very nice! I love the new airports.euroga.org database!
It’s coming along 
@Peter I’m itching to add a few details to this database…
Flew through a couple of airports, and looking at hangarage for the SE England area, and can’t find nearly enough online.
I’d love to add these details to the list as well.
It is intended only for fly-in type scenarios, but I’d still love to add hangarage fees (and what they include, e.g. Gloucester includes landings for 500 pounds a month)
Peter wrote:
The fully anonymous option is also possible but would be seen by most to produce reports that are worth less… Views? There are very good reasons for nicknames on a forum but are there good reasons for suppressing even the nickname on an airport report? Is somebody going to write something so negative about an airport that they want to conceal even their forum nickname?
The only reason why I wouldn’t be happy to reveal identity (i.e. publicly post e-mail address or phone number) is spam. Other than that I don’t have any problem writing my full name when commenting something in positive or negative fashion – I always stand behind my words and the way how I express my opinion. However, I appreciate the reasons why some people have to remain anonymous and I’m not against anonymous posts in this database. IMO it’s better to have anonymous post than to force people to open another profile on EuroGA if they don’t want some report to be connected to their usual profile here. In other words, I would always leave poster’s forum name to be clickable (what’s the difference between leaving it clickable in database and being visible which can be copy-pasted to search EuroGA forum?) but I would also leave the opportunity for post to be anonymous.
Indeed; all good stuff. Many thanks. Where to find the AIP is a key one, because this database should not be storing stuff for which the AIP is a primary source.
In addition, some of us might give the consent to be contacted directly in order to provide some more details and advices.
The current plan is to provide a clickable link to the poster’s profile on EuroGA. This profile is public anyway* and there, if you are a logged-in user with posting/PM privileges, you can send a PM.
I wonder if the clickability of that link should be configurable? If selected non-clickable, it would make it a bit harder to contact the poster, but you could still find the person’s profile (assuming he/she ever posted on the forum) and send them a PM. However only about 1/3 of all those who signed up have ever posted, so this would make the other 2/3 totally uncontactable.
The fully anonymous option is also possible but would be seen by most to produce reports that are worth less… Views? There are very good reasons for nicknames on a forum but are there good reasons for suppressing even the nickname on an airport report? Is somebody going to write something so negative about an airport that they want to conceal even their forum nickname?
Nothing stops someone putting an email address in the free text comments, but it would be a recipe for getting spammed. Even phone numbers aren’t safe these days.
* except that the public email address configured there (most people don’t have one there, which is sensible) is visible only to logged-in users
These have probably been listed, but having just experienced a language barrier and some helpful pilots, I’d like to see:
- wifi details
- taxi information (local transport)
- courtesy car details
- quick link(s) to AIP info on the airfield (and/or the airfield website itself)
Each data should be accompanied with date, so we can know how recent info is. In addition, some of us might give the consent to be contacted directly in order to provide some more details and advices.
