Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

GPS jamming and spoofing and relying on GPS, and GPS backup plan ?

Peter wrote:

Surely an airliner can set up its INS at the gate (the coordinates are on a big board right in front of the cockpit, in the parked position) and then just fly; no GPS needed.

The problem is not getting to Tartu. It is that all IAPs there require RNP 1. Even the ILS does for the initial and missed approach segments.

ESKC (Uppsala/Sundbro), Sweden

Peter wrote:

Surely an airliner can set up its INS at the gate (the coordinates are on a big board right in front of the cockpit, in the parked position) and then just fly; no GPS needed. It is only in recent years (10-15, depending on which airline pilot you ask) that airliners used GPS at all.

I think challenge is that the IAP cannot be flown on INS, and AFAIK they’ve got one runway end without ILS. @ivark might be able to comment further.

EGTR

Even the ILS does for the initial and missed approach segments

That seems a bit dumb…

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

Radar Vectoring might helped, but Tartu has got radar approach control etc.
http://eaip.eans.ee/2024-04-18/html/eAIP/EE-AD-2.EETU-en-GB.html#EETU-AD-2.18

According to the above they’ve got only AFIS.

EGTR

arj1 wrote:

Radar Vectoring might helped, but Tartu has got radar approach control etc.
http://eaip.eans.ee/2024-04-18/html/eAIP/EE-AD-2.EETU-en-GB.html#EETU-AD-2.18

According to the above they’ve got only AFIS.

Yes. Radar is available but of course AFIS can’t do radar vectoring. From what I read in a news the other day, the plan is to put proper ATC in Tartu. Then aircraft can be radar vectored for the initial and missed approaches of the ILS and don’t have to rely on GPS. (Sorry, I don’t remember where I read it so no link…)

ESKC (Uppsala/Sundbro), Sweden

arj1 wrote:

I think challenge is that the IAP cannot be flown on INS, and AFAIK they’ve got one runway end without ILS. @ivark might be able to comment further.

we have ILS only on 26 , missed approach and IAP need GPS and as they changed the CTR to info 2 years ago, ATC cannot give vectors. And the DME is only certified upwards of FL100. Now they want to modify DME-DME to work also on lower altitudes and maybe install additional VOR.

EETU, Estonia

To spend the money on an ILS and require GPS seems really dumb. Especially anywhere near Russia.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

EGPWS/TAWS also requires GPS. MEL limitations may restrict operations without TAWS availability.

Avionics geek.
Somewhere remote in Devon, UK.
Sign in to add your message

Back to Top