Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to Euro GA. This website is the home of interesting, informed and intelligent discussion about General Aviation in Europe. We hope you'll enjoy it and find it useful. Please do get involved by posting on our forums and take a look at our articles. If you'd like to publish any  yourself then please get in touch.  

New! EuroGA Classifieds. Buy or sell everything aviation related.
Also new: Meetups - see a list of upcoming EuroGA meetups.


What We're Talking About On EuroGA >>

G1000 upgraded to WAAS: LPV, KAP 140, and capturing vertical path

Img 6493 Images Img 2310 Tb20 9 Img 7269 Hbdwcavtar Cit mus flt18 hires

Hello,

Just as an intellectual game (just after PBN course), I looked into WAAS upgrade, for a non-WAAS G1000 C182.

As you may know, there is a SB released by Cessna, with a Modification Kit, to perform the upgrade. It costs several tens thousand of dollars – just mad. Maybe the parts will be less expensive some day, and upgrade will be more easily feasible.
The only good point is that upgrade is rather easy: just swap two GIA63 from the avionics bay for two GIA63W, and change the two COM/GPS antennas. Upgrade the software, and you’re done. Much easier than Peter’s next winter

My questions was about AP coupling.

Without WAAS, the KAP140 is able to couple in NAV mode with any NAV/GPS signal (lateral).
In APPR mode, it will follow an ILS, LOC and GLIDE (lateral and vertical).

After WAAS upgrade, you will be able to perform LPV approaches.
Here and there on internet, some people claim that the KAP140 will have horizontal and vertical coupling for LPV, as LPV generates the same kind of vertical signal as an ILS glide slope.

However, in a revision from the initial SB, Cessna states this:

The Honeywell KAP-140 autopilot, if installed and operational, will couple and track the lateral guidance provided by the SBAS navigational guidance. However, the vertical component of any GPS approach must be managed and flown by the pilot. The KAP-140 autopilot WILL NOT couple to GPS vertical guidance.

Would be interesting to read your opinion about this !

G ahau sml
Without the report, it's impossible to say if they were overgross - in a C172N, you don't need to be a jockey to have 4 adults - 4 me-sized adults will fit in a C172N and leave enough for more than...
Images
What is the amount of fuel you feel comfortable to have on landing? (From my desk), I'd be fairly comfortable (not taking into account frustration) orbiting above an airport for 1h if I knew I had ...
Img 3788
This has to be the least efficient way to fill up the cellar :)
Img 6493
Of course, but the bulk of them was built before that (2005-2008 boom years). The same is true for DA40s, C172s/182s, etc.
5338039634192457442
Which one you want to run a 42 km or a 35km marathons? Unless you are a specialist in 34km-36km just go for the full 42km run, on the long term it should be good? But agree with Peter, you don't ha...
Tb20 9
Same code, surely. Just a different user interface. Has the web interface become undocumented? They must be aware of this. Maybe something in my account config.
Babypilotmedium
Depending on the runways in use at Heathrow and City, transit is very often not above 1500’, or even at 1400’, via the London Eye. Following an engine failure northbound at, say, Holb...
Tb20 9
There is a fairly obvious terrain related reason why Calvi doesn't do night VFR The UK allows it, FWIW. Loads of NQ training is done here.