Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to EuroGA. This website is the home of interesting, informed and intelligent discussion about General Aviation in Europe. We hope you’ll enjoy it and find it useful. Please do get involved by posting on our forums and take a look at our articles. If you’d like to publish any yourself then please get in touch.  


New! EuroGA Airport Database. Contribute reports on places you’ve visited.
Also new: Meetups – see a list of upcoming EuroGA meetups.


What We’re Talking About On EuroGA

>>

KLN94 database change: showing the missed approach

20200705029300507 8f5a243d c1c5 4bdb 993d bf53040ecf34

I have started seeing this only recently.

It also displays a bizzare distance to the airport: 90nm instead of 72nm. The rationale for that is a mystery to me.

Group Exercise – EASA Part ML (Owner Declared) Aircraft Maintenance Program

Easafdava2 E78d6ee4 ec10 44c7 9ca5 b2e234b7e092 Img 6094 2

aircraft_maintenance_programmes_for_ela1_aircraft_not_used_in_commercial_operations_pdf
EASA_AMP_pdf
EASA_MIP_pdf
Cessna_100_Series_Piston_Continued_Airworthiness_Program_pdf
Cessna 150 1977 MM D2011-1-13.pdf
[file fixed – it was over the 20MB size limit]

I’m trying to understand how to formulate a correct owner declared AMP (aircraft maintenance program) under Part-ML based NOT on the manufacturer (“design approval holder”) maintenance program but containing only those items necessary according to the MIP (minimum inspection program) as well as any airworthiness limitations.

Some background info (with compliments from the UK CAA)

Part-ML simplifies existing maintenance rules and offers a less prescriptive and burdensome approach to maintenance programmes, airworthiness reviews, defects deferments and TBO extensions. It also provides more privileges for pilots, owners, independent certifying staff and small maintenance organisations. For example:

The CAA (any EASA CAA actually, note of author) will no longer be involved in the approval of maintenance programmes for Light aircraft.
A new Airworthiness Review Certificate (EASA Form 15c) has been introduced that can be issued by the CAA, by an approved organisation or by independent Part-66 engineers with an appropriate authorisation.
(Any EASA, note by author) CAA Generic Requirements (e.g. GR No.24) have been revised to remove their applicability to EASA Aircraft Types, including those within the scope of Part-ML

The “example” aircraft in question is a 1977 Cessna Reims F150M.

Step 1 → See attached EASA AMP template

Step 2 → See attached EASA MIP

I’m currently stuck at Step 3 → find out which airworthiness limitations exist for the plane to add them line by line to the AMP.
A Diamond DA40 will have these items listed in Chapter 4 of the Maintenance Manual, whereas items listed in Chapter 5 are not mandatory.

Where could I find the necessary data for a 1977 F150M?

The (attached as pdf) 1977 Service Manual doesn’t list anything.
The (also attached as pdf) Cessna 100 Series Piston Continued Airworthiness Programm contains a myriad of items, are all these “airworthiness limitations” in the context of EASA Part-ML?

Step 4 → formulate AMP (ideally in coordination with the organisation or part 66 person that will do the ARC)
Do owner pilot maintenance items need to be specifically mentioned in the AMP? If I understand correctly, anybody can “work” on the plane if the work is signed of by someone authorized?

Would be great if we could educate each other on this topic! Thank you!

And now for a VERY different type of aircraft – Archeopteryx

Avatar

Check out the Archaeopteryx ! Takes the term ‘self launched’ to a totally new level.

Pilot
@Snoopy we have several such people in our club, shoot me a DM if you like.
Huskyav
V-Tails must be one of the nicest looking tricycle aircraft about. One day perhaps

Tip tanks, upgraded panel, it should be a serious touring machine.

Pilot
I am guessing this chart, assumes you get airborne before you start decelerating. “Distance includes 3 second recognition time at abort speed” This of course is quite different to part 25, or a per…
000avatar09
Iceland Review Online:

“Authorities were currently exploring ways to reach young people to communicate the importance of preventative measures when it came to tackling COVID-19. Presently, the larg…

0263be7b 42d5 4e12 92f5 1714ac8eb875

Peter: Do you have a name or email source for this?
It would be useful to have something to defend myself on this when challenged by Border Force. To say: “A friend of mine spoke to someone who s…

Clipperstorch
Have we had this one already?
Img 2991
Avionicare at Southend and Tatenhill Aviation are the remaining Bendix-King authorised dealers in the UK.

I had access to a test set until a couple of weeks ago but it’s been relocated as the busin…

2573824682 315bed39b3 q
Here are some people who survived for 3 days. Looking at the pictures I wonder whether their ‘SOS’ might have been more distinctive than the official ‘V’ sign.