It seems that most can’t.
Some Lyco variants (which don’t have a combined dipstick + filler hole) can reportedly be inspected in so far as one can see some cam lobe(s), just about.
But it seems a dumb design. It would be so easy to have a screw-in inspection plug somewhere, or several of them.
Pulling cylinders to check the camshaft is ridiculous.
Peter wrote:
But it seems a dumb design.
They were designed BEFORE borescopes were readily available to A&Ps !
Our current Lycoming engines were designed so long ago, it was before cameras in general were invented :)
So you will have to wait for autonomous nano robots that can swim around in the oil, take some photos, bluetooth them to you, then sacrifice themselves in the combustion chamber.
Seriously though, is there no path to the cams at all? If there is a path, how narrow is it and how much articulation would you need to get there?
vic wrote:
Provided you get the exact numbers of valve lift from the manufacturer you will be able to tell exactly how much wear there is in the valve train.
In theory, but there are variables that will give you false readings since the valve lifter have hydraulically actuated plungers.
vic wrote:
that is he base of the problem: With solid followers any mechanic would be able to tell there is wear as he would have to do adjustments at each periodic check – assuming he is keeping records of all previous justments
Exactly
What about camshaft corrosion or other damage? You can’t necessarily detect that from the valve lift.
I think my choice might be to pull one cylinder and use a bore scope, if the normal valve lift check, achievable static rpm or metal in the filter indicated a problem.