Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

Glass v. Conventional avionics - usability

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

I haven’t done much night flying with my Aspen but it auto dims to a satisfactory level.

Surprising number of pilots here can’t interpret analogue or digital altimeters!

Spending too long online
EGTF Fairoaks, EGLL Heathrow, United Kingdom

I have flown Aspen extensively night and day and I have to say that its brightness has never been an issue that has impinged on my consciousness, so I guess they must have got it absolutely right!

EGKB Biggin Hill

The “too bright” pictures of G1000 weew on auto dimming btw

Noe wrote:

The “too bright” pictures of G1000 weew on auto dimming btw

The dimming gradient can be adjusted in install mode.

LFPT, LFPN

Good to know, thanks.

AOPA Accident Report



Last Edited by Timothy at 31 Jan 20:21
EGKB Biggin Hill

The view of my office today.
Bangkok – VTBD to Phuket Airpark – VTSW (grass strip) On my way to FL260.
I adore this set up. Works great for me.

E
PS Before the eagle eyed wonder… The KFC display is not shagged, just caught the light strangely…



eal
Lovin' it
VTCY VTCC VTBD

WOW – 2 transponders – a real plane

BTW to get the multiplexed displays to come out you need a shutter speed of 1/60 or slower.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

eal wrote:

The view of my office today.

You got all the tools, but don’t take offense when I say that it’s a bit of a jumble. You certainly prove that it is possible to do away with the versus in Glass v. Conventional, but rather make it Glass & Conventional.

Have you got any integration setup? I notice you get traffic on your GNS430. I guess all the screens are just a tad too small to provide a level of integration without clutter.

An example of a Glass & Conventional setup that I think is done pretty neatly:

Traffic on the G600 MFD, Wx Radar/Stormscope/TAWS on the GTN750

Sign in to add your message

Back to Top