These things just go round and round like one of these
because
It’s the same all over Europe AFAICT
There is no evidence that GPS usage produces more infringements. The current rate of infringements seems very hard to reduce; they are the product of the natural human error rate coupled with airspace complexity and variable ATC services. In the UK, we have the draconian new policy to bust 100% of infringers.
alioth wrote:
Honestly, the whole insistence on “paper and pen” is a bit silly.
Indeed. What is important is that you plan what’s going to happen before the flight and don’t simply launch along the magenta line.
Indeed. What is important is that you plan what’s going to happen before the flight and don’t simply launch along the magenta line.
Absolutely. The problem is, there is no longer a practical need to do it, and therefore it won’t be done. At least nowhere near as thoroughly as with paper and pen.
I’m a microlight instructor, and from 2020 sometime in the spring, a new syllabus will be in effect. Navigation will then shift from paper and pen to GPS only. So I have to “teach” people to use SD, EasyVFR, Garmin etc etc. First, there is nothing to teach. The finger gymnastics needed is something you have to learn by yourself. What is lost is the planning IMO. What you learn using paper and pen is to create a proper navigational plan, and a plan B and C. How do you learn to plan properly? Paper map and pen.
Still, I’m positive to it. It will be interesting to see how it turns out. These GPS apps can be connected to flight sims. You can create lots of “make believ” plans and fiddle and “fly” using the sim. Maybe this will more than make up for it, I don’t know.