Electronic flight bags / electronic in-flight data

@julian_vw, I agree with Noe. I am happy to fill it in, and have a lot of experience and strong views, but only when it is editorially less confusing.

Who reads the survey rubrics ?

Anyway, filled it out, despite the slightly “confusing” layout…

The questions are repetitive and include:

I believe electronic flight bags are independent of place.

I genuinely have no idea what that means.

julian_vw wrote:

I am a business student

Perhaps you should ask a pilot or two to help with the questions. I had a quick look and they’re nonsense.

Well, it’s for a Masters. That’s the appropriate standard nowadays.

julian_vw wrote:

Thanks for the heads up! It was coded correctly but I changed the layout with “strongly agree” on the far right.

I just looked again:

So I checked the source:

I think that @julian_vw should stop wasting our time. I’m sure we’d love to help, but he needs better supervision before he is allowed out.

A masters in computer science at the Open University at Milton Keynes includes HTML and javascript. I know this because I went on a date with one graduate, c. 2001

Timothy wrote:

I think that @julian_vw should stop wasting our time. I’m sure we’d love to help, but he needs better supervision before he is allowed out.

Harsh but true…
I think @julian_vw should have not used an “irritating multinational corporate customer service” questionaire as his model on how questionaires should be constructed.