… except at certain aerodromes…
BTW the Rotax 915 is discussed here.
What about using this power plant?
http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Rotax-Announces-New-135-hp-Turbocharged-Engine-224487-1.html
Car fuel is available world wide.
Jan_Olieslagers wrote:
Without a turbo,
The 100hp engine is “supercharged” Gemini 100 , the 125hp engine “turbocharged” according to their website.
Wasn’t that Gemini a two-stroke engine? Without a turbo, it must be quite inefficient, and the exhaust fumes all but clean. I think a non-turbo two stroke is a very poor idea.
achimha wrote:
the most interesting part of the design. The exhaust as well
The cooler and exhaust will vary according to the aircraft. It is hardly very interesting. This is the non-turbo version, so no need for inter cooler also. But it is clearly not ready yet. I will give them a year, if they have not got something workable by then, it will never happen.
As always, the mockup is missing the cooler — the most interesting part of the design. The exhaust as well. Seems they still have some way to go…
Here
http://www.flyingmag.com/aircraft/lsasport/superiors-gemini-diesel-coming-legend-cub
I hope it works out OK. Then this engine is a must-have. It doesn’t really matter what the real-life consumption is. The power is right (100 HP), the weight is right (80 kg) and it runs Jet A1.
