Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

Voltage Regulator issues (+ alternator overhaul)

vic wrote:

A rewind for the 3 ph rotor in the photo right is only € 110

Yep, and the part on the right is very familiar to my eyes. Unfortunately they do go ‘open’ fairly often, and the charge light does not come on in that situation. I carry a spare rotor on my motorcycle and the little rod needed to self extract the rotor using the center retaining screw. Brushes for the same type of Bosch alternators (with non-segmented slip rings that are relatively kind to brushes) last about 90,000 miles or 145,000 km in my experience – I’ve worn them out from new. I’d guess that’s about 2,500 or 3,000 hrs. I don’t carry spare brushes.

The early solid state voltage regulator fitted to my aircraft was original after 40+ years and working fine. I replaced it in error while trying to solve a ‘charging’ problem that ended up being an intermittent ammeter failure! Luckily the previous owner had bought a spare regulator of the same type in a failed effort to solve the same problem, so the replacement was free and I still have a good spare. I replaced the alternator itself at the same time, for the same (non) reason but the original looked a bit sad when removed and inspected, so I’m happy I did it – particularly as the plane has electrically controlled propeller pitch.

Last Edited by Silvaire at 12 Oct 16:38
Yesss, they had a series of failed rotors with the /5 types in the seventies till Bosch did reinforced impregnated windings. Had that myself in the 80ies in Scotland and no lights for the return trip to Bavaria. Fortunately despite the “modern” 3 ph alternator on the R 69 S I had still the ooold magneto so I returned home with no lights anyway. Vic

vic
EDME

My field current is 2.7A with engine off.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom
Question is where is this going to. At least this should not burn any brushes or sliprings. Anyway, I don´t know the aviation regulators and their logic – better not to know. We are running a 3000 W DC , four brush generator on the Yak, no diodes anywhere. Same type like in submarines, tanks, trucks or so …. Vic
Last Edited by vic at 12 Oct 16:49
vic
EDME

Peter wrote:

Actually I wonder how many regulators are going to make a smooth transition to regulating, if you turned the field current ON and started the engine and let it go up to say 2000rpm. It is initially getting the max possible field current (limited only by the resistance of the field winding) and it will be getting that same current as the alternator output is shooting up as the engine revs up. It would not surprise me if there was an overshoot on the bus. Another reason to have the avionics master switch OFF during starting.

Valid point!

vic wrote:

Question is where is this going to.

It is offcourse fun to compare with other equipment, but it does not help the topic starter.

Peter wrote:

My field current is 2.7A with engine off.

Yes, typical field current is between 2 A and 4 A depending on alternator.

vic wrote:

As far as I know the 3 phase alternators no direct battery current is fed into the field coil =rotor winding.

This is untrue, it is, on models with external regulator, such as used in aviation, battery voltage is regulated by the regulator feeding the field winding.

Car alternators, often have an internal regulator. In this situation limited current is fed to the field winding, enabling the alternator. The alternator output is fed back into the regulator, as it also requires more current to get it going. On a alternator with internal regulator, you have to apply field only during start, you could disconnect that wire if you would want to, the alternator would stay working ok, as it is supplying it’s own voltage for the regulator. This is just like you’re saying. Don’t forget this feed point for the internal regulator is in the end the same point as with an external regulator.

When you disconnect field wire on an alternator with external regulator, the alternator will instantly switch off.

You can not switch off an internal regulator alternator other then by stopping the motion (kill the engine). On an external regulator you can switch on and off the alternator as
you please.

vic wrote:

As only field current at a few amps is sent into the rotor the brushes should last a very long time, a few thousand hours typically. I am very eager to learn why this should not be the case with your familiar aircraft power source as opposed to car types. Vic

You WILL NOT get anywhere near thousands of hours on a typical general aviation alternator. This suggestion is not a good idea, and I would recommend everyone with an alternator to do 500 hours inspection.
Differences between a car alternator and aviation alternator do excist.
Do not switch on alternator field with engine off during walk around / maintenance, it will wear brushes. On a car or motorcycle this is not applicable due to the internal regulator system.
Lower air pressure is also an issue and will introduce more wear. One of the reason that some relays are gas filled, and some magneto’s are pressurised to prevent unwanted sparking. HF tuners on older airliners are also pressurised to prevent sparking.

vic wrote:

We are running a 3000 W DC , four brush generator on the Yak, no diodes anywhere.

Generators have their own advantages and disadvantages, they require voltage and current control, and typically have only a small RPM band in which they operate well, the RPM range of an alternator is much larger. The DC generator has the advantage that it is selfexciting.

JP-Avionics
EHMZ

Jesse wrote:

Do not switch on alternator field with engine off during walk around / maintenance, it will wear brushes.

I’d be interested to know if there’s test data to support this assertion. Brushes do wear in proportion to current, but the slip ring being stationary would not negatively affect the situation. I would’ve guessed the limited time involved with walk around / maintenance would make this a theoretical issue, not worth considering in the real world even at max brush current.

(I have about $30M worth of experience developing brushed machines, with small brushes carrying hundreds of amps each. Its an interesting area)

Last Edited by Silvaire at 12 Oct 19:06

Silvaire wrote:

I’d be interested to know if there’s test data to support this assertion. Brushes do wear in proportion to current, but the slip ring being stationary would not negatively affect the situation.

You can see discollored spots. Apart from that you are wasting quite some energy without a reason

JP-Avionics
EHMZ

ive decided on my route forward to build in the maximum reliability into the charging system. The old suspect Ford 60amp alternator has 560 hours on it since its rebuild. I can have it rebuilt again for £450. I’ve decided not to and have ordered a National Air Parts 70 amp brand new unit for $1100 (£700). This unit replaces the Ford unit and needs only a logbook entry (N reg).
As for the voltage regulator or to give it its correct name the Alternator Control Unit I’m not sure the old Lamar unit has been affected by the alternator issues so that is being replaced with a Zaftronics more modern unit.
All the wiring has been checked including the battery earth and confirmed voltage drops are within tolerance. So, that’s the best I can do for a reliable setup.

EGNS/Garey Airstrip, Isle of Man

I have about $30M worth of experience developing brushed machines

How does one express experience in USD?

Im using the FORD 95A alternator on my P210.
They are notoriously bad. (Had owned my P210 for 0:05 flight hours when the first one broke)
Replaced it with an OH unit from Kelly. Charged ok, but had a serious background noise problem. Diodes on the rectifier plate was broken from day 1. Unit 1 week outside warranty when we discovered where the noise was coming from.(Im not buying anything more from Hartzell/Kelly)
Installed a used unit that has worked pretty well, but has now started showing signs of wear.
So I bought all the required parts(in the US) for an local repair of the “new” alternator. The first shop that opened it up saw the ceramic coating on the rectifier assembly wire joints, and refused to repair. Coating to hard to remove they claimed……

Not keen on shipping the Alternator to the US just to redo the soldering/ceramic coating on the new rectifier board.

spirit49
LOIH
Sign in to add your message

Back to Top