Peter wrote:
But this is for CofA aircraft, not Annex 1.
Many Annex 1 aircraft have a full ICAO-compliant CofA.
Yes; I said that above, as a potentially valuable combination.
But the bottom line here is that with the PA18 you cannot make use of EASA principles – because it is Annex 1, despite having a CofA. What matters is what the inspector working for the State of Registry accepts (the local version of the UK LAA inspector) which will to a significant degree depend on which side of the bed he fell off that morning.
I can’t readily see what registry hypoxiacub is under. Well, I could dig around his various published articles, looking for photos, but it may have changed. Here it was N-reg, or maybe Swedish.
I used this when I solved the overheating problem in our Bonanza by installing the baffle kits for all cylinders incl. the enhanced louvres.
Has anybody used this EASA validation procedure recently?
I´m looking to install a EI FP-5L fuel calculator (got the 8130-3 form), and no EASA STC exists from the OEM, but there is an FAA STC and my airplane is on the FAA AML.
Just wondering what´s the most recent charges to be expected and imposed by EASA for this simple one-off STC?
You could even install it under CS-STAN (CS-SC208a), in which case no STC or STC validation is needed.
boscomantico wrote:
You could even install it under CS-STAN (CS-SC208a), in which case no STC or STC validation is needed.
Really? Pardon my ignorance, but this also involves the installation of a fuel transducer in the fuel supply line to the engine. The CS-STAN procedure is acceptable to a part-CAO on certified ELPs for this installation?
I gave you the applicable section of CS-STAN. Check the details with your avionics installer. It has to be released to service of course.
boscomantico wrote:
I gave you the applicable section of CS-STAN. Check the details with your avionics installer. It has to be released to service of course.
Okidokie. Very useful reference. I don´t see why not to use the CS-STAN for a none primary engine instrument, it´s also pretty much specifically described in the part you reference. I will forward to the CAO. Cheers.
