Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

Passed (too) two!

Takk, for det Herr Svingen!

LFPT, LFPN

Gratulerer

The elephant is the circulation
ENVA ENOP ENMO, Norway

showing it as such to show that the 14 ATPL exams were not done, to make sure that if you do a CPL later you do get into the special dead-end CPL/IR which can never become an ATPL

This is actually shown in the “remarks” section (XIII) of the license.

I agree that nothing should be shown apart from IR. An IR is an IR is an IR.

London area

Bravo !

FAA A&P/IA
LFPN

I would do the full ATPL exams (for the final reason in your list) if it was possible through self-study without involving an approved ground school.

ESKC (Uppsala/Sundbro), Sweden

Wasn’t it so that training towards the CB-IR, and experience gained from it cannot be used towards a CPL-IR? In other words a PPL withCB-IR would need to do the IR all over again should he want to pursue a CPL/ATPL?

You absolutely can now go on and do the EASA CPL, 13 exams and the training and the CPL test.

Then you will have a CPL/IR.

But, because

  • the 7 CB IR exams you have done are not a subset of the 14 ATPL exams (except HP&L), and
  • the 13 CPL exams you will do for the CPL are not a subset of the 14 ATPL exams (except HP&L and Met)

your CPL/IR, while in every respect being a CPL/IR, cannot be used to gain an ATPL (done via the standard EASA route of starting with a CPL/IR and logging 1500hrs of which 500 are in a multi pilot cockpit).

So if you want the ATPL, you will need to do the 14 ATPL exams! (Except HP&L and Met so “only” 12 ) and then get a RHS job with a jet operator, unless you are John Travolta in which case you can do the 500hrs in a sim.

I hope I got this right… the point I was trying to make earlier is that the situation has not changed at all since the JAA PPL/IR, which started around 2000, yet that one was marked in your license as “IR” not “PPL/IR” etc etc. I did mine in 2011 and it is marked “IR”

I can fully understand ATO business protection but why do it now and not in year 2000? The 7 old JAA/IR exams were not a subset of the 14 either (except, again HP&L).

I have a feeling the reason is that the “system” realised that nobody keeps track of old exam passes, not least because you can sit them anywhere in EASA-land, so this is done to prevent cheating. But it could also be the old fear of “the skies filling up with Cessna 150s” as a result of the CB IR… I have heard that one in various ATC presentations. They used to say that about VLJs but I think everybody has now realised that is a dead horse.

The bigger Q is why would you want an ATPL?

  • to get a job with a company that requires it
  • to be LHS in a transport jet (Part 25 only maybe?)
  • the 14 ATPL exam passes are a way to get the HPA (needed for privately flown turboprops and jets, April 2016 on)
  • to be the most qualified instructor in a flying school, when competing for students
  • to satisfy your sado masochistic inner self

Realistically I cannot see any PPL-only pilot aged anywhere near 50 wanting the full 14-exam ATPL – because they are too old to get a job that needs it.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

Congrats!

Congrats.

From EASA: There is no rating called cbr-ir! It is an IR, CBR is just a way to get it.

United Kingdom

Congrats Aviathor

EIWT Weston, Ireland

Wasn’t it so that training towards the CB-IR, and experience gained from it cannot be used towards a CPL-IR? In other words a PPL withCB-IR would need to do the IR all over again should he want to pursue a CPL/ATPL?

In that case wouldn’t the obvious reason for that be to preserve the ATO business?

LFPT, LFPN
12 Posts
Sign in to add your message

Back to Top