Takk, for det Herr Svingen!
Gratulerer
showing it as such to show that the 14 ATPL exams were not done, to make sure that if you do a CPL later you do get into the special dead-end CPL/IR which can never become an ATPL
This is actually shown in the “remarks” section (XIII) of the license.
I agree that nothing should be shown apart from IR. An IR is an IR is an IR.
Bravo !
I would do the full ATPL exams (for the final reason in your list) if it was possible through self-study without involving an approved ground school.
Wasn’t it so that training towards the CB-IR, and experience gained from it cannot be used towards a CPL-IR? In other words a PPL withCB-IR would need to do the IR all over again should he want to pursue a CPL/ATPL?
You absolutely can now go on and do the EASA CPL, 13 exams and the training and the CPL test.
Then you will have a CPL/IR.
But, because
your CPL/IR, while in every respect being a CPL/IR, cannot be used to gain an ATPL (done via the standard EASA route of starting with a CPL/IR and logging 1500hrs of which 500 are in a multi pilot cockpit).
So if you want the ATPL, you will need to do the 14 ATPL exams! (Except HP&L and Met so “only” 12 ) and then get a RHS job with a jet operator, unless you are John Travolta in which case you can do the 500hrs in a sim.
I hope I got this right… the point I was trying to make earlier is that the situation has not changed at all since the JAA PPL/IR, which started around 2000, yet that one was marked in your license as “IR” not “PPL/IR” etc etc. I did mine in 2011 and it is marked “IR”
I can fully understand ATO business protection but why do it now and not in year 2000? The 7 old JAA/IR exams were not a subset of the 14 either (except, again HP&L).
I have a feeling the reason is that the “system” realised that nobody keeps track of old exam passes, not least because you can sit them anywhere in EASA-land, so this is done to prevent cheating. But it could also be the old fear of “the skies filling up with Cessna 150s” as a result of the CB IR… I have heard that one in various ATC presentations. They used to say that about VLJs but I think everybody has now realised that is a dead horse.
The bigger Q is why would you want an ATPL?
Realistically I cannot see any PPL-only pilot aged anywhere near 50 wanting the full 14-exam ATPL – because they are too old to get a job that needs it.
Congrats!
Congrats.
From EASA: There is no rating called cbr-ir! It is an IR, CBR is just a way to get it.
Congrats Aviathor
Wasn’t it so that training towards the CB-IR, and experience gained from it cannot be used towards a CPL-IR? In other words a PPL withCB-IR would need to do the IR all over again should he want to pursue a CPL/ATPL?
In that case wouldn’t the obvious reason for that be to preserve the ATO business?