Timothy wrote:
There is too much potential abuse from those that believe that abuse is the best way of furthering their ends for me to comment on that.I’m not prepared to engage in a surrogate “politics of infringements” discussion on here.
So the CAA are abusing you and so are we!
The response was to call me, IIRC, irresponsible, inexperienced and ignorant, or some such combination of words (though quickly followed by an apology).
Where was that? At some meeting or conference?
So the CAA are abusing you and so are we!
Not uncommon when you sit between two groups who are both on transmit, not receive.
Where was that? At some meeting or conference?
At a meeting.
I’m on receive this afternoon. My batteries are low.
At a meeting.
It takes a lot of blind arrogance to call someone that.
Always interesting to know the career background of the speaker in such situations 
General Montgomery had a picture of Rommel hanging in his command tent
Timothy wrote:
Not uncommon when you sit between two groups who are both on transmit, not receive.
I think that is something very difficult to judge unless you dont have an axe to grind.
At least there are some of us who dont, because we havent been involved in the process in any way, and therefore can be unbiased.
