Stephan_Schwab wrote:
Yes, I notice now. Anyway it’s the invoice I paid. I doubt it makes any difference but in the end the invoicing party should know.
EDDL has once overcharged me when they put the wrong type (in that case, a P28A type with higher MTOW) and I had my friends paying the invoice. They later refunded the overcharge to me. So that seems to happen sometimes there. ;-) They type in the type designator and it pulls the stored MTOW and the charges are based on that.
boscomantico wrote:
When turning outbound from BAM, which is an IAF for this approach, I noticed that the initial approach was coded incorrectly in the database of the KLN94
I`ve never had this problem before with my KLN94, somewhat scary even if easy to detect in this case. This means I cannot count on the database. One should report it to Honeywell and ask for a refund. For which reason a monthly update is necessary if such errors happen?
Stephan_Schwab wrote:
I can report that I never paid more than 140 something for landing
That matches my recollection of a landing at EDDK in September 2015. I could dig up the bill…
